On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Vincent Untz <vuntz@opensuse.org> wrote:
Another sample: openSUSE rccrypto scripts, they do not work, and are not going to be repaired.
It's simply because things work differently in systemd. The features provided by rccrypto scripts in sysvinit are also present in systemd, but just provided another way.
Or am I missing something?
IMVHO, instead of breaking everything, rccrypto scripts should have invoked that functionality you mention to make it transparent to the user. This is all assuming that functionality is there and really equivalent as you say (which in some cases I remember it was not, like the case of vmware stuff and everything status-querying-related). Why do I think so? Because sysadmins all over the place (and end users too) have a large body of scripts they will want to... not rewrite. You can't remove "rcstuff" and say it's ok, it's not on your users eyes. If you don't care, well, you're entitled not to care. As your users are entitled to be upset. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org