On 03/06/13 16:25, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 04:23:37PM +0200, Josef Reidinger wrote:
I hope it will answer your question. Don't hesitate to ask if something is not clear, but unless there is strong reason to not use ruby we will use it as it is the easiest way for us to convert ycp to modern well known language.
Isn't ruby really slow compared to e.g. python?
Cheers, Michael.
Yes I think this is true, but it was only really relevant on ruby 1.8 times (and depends a lot on the specific benchmark). Ruby 1.9 is quite ok, and YaST is not a place where you will notice it. No sat-solver in ruby, just glue code between human workflows and native code. Still, if you want numbers: http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u32/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=yarv&lang2=python3 -- Duncan Mac-Vicar P. - http://www.suse.com/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org