On Sunday 18 January 2015 11:11:10 Michal Kubecek wrote:
In particular, this part:
This is a very ridiculous statement, sorry.
The package maintainers will not be 'pushed' to drop it. Nor will any scripts ensure there are no initV scripts. That's just pure non-sense
I guess that only Dominque can answer what his intentions were, however what I have seen so far is again a big flame war against systemd. My understanding from Tomas is that he just wants to implement a rpmlint message that indicates that the package does not contain any systemd scripts despite that it has a number of init scripts. Nowhere it has been said that the package is not allowed to have initscripts, just that openSUSE would like to move on and ensure that every package that has initscripts also has systemd unit files. Again I would welcome this, as that I as user has the option to choose what startup scripts I want to use. Maybe we should even try to split those packages and let the user decide whether to install the <packagename>- initscripts or <packagename>-systemd packages. I for one would very much welcome this as that I don't think that using the display-manager initscript is really reflecting the current situation. A lot of display-managers upstream have already been ported to systemd unit files and we are actually removing them, just to keep something "hackish" in place. We either start moving towards the future and ensure that we are delivering a strong distribution or we just keep living in the past with the knowledge that one day openSUSE no longer exists as a distribution because its lost its relevance. Regards Raymond -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org