On Saturday 03 September 2011 16:17:49 Robert Schweikert wrote:
On a more serious note, you have to look at the bright side of things. While it is a major inconvenience for many to deal with the changes in GNOME3, and as I, a good number of people choose not to deal with the changes and switch to a different DE, there are innovations in GNOME3 which will be attractive to a group of users.
There in nothing bad in introducing the G-Shell. What is bad is destructing Gnome.
Further, I'd say, for users mostly using a browser and a few other programs now and then, GNOME3 might improve their desktop experience.
If it is able to improve desktop experience for someone, I doubt you outlined the group correctly. There was nothing difficult with using browser in Gnome 2.
Of course a good number of those people could happily live with Chromebooks as well.
In the end the GNOME community decided that this is the way they see the future of the DE. This works for some,
The minority.
and not for others,
The majority.
and that part is exactly the same as it was before.
Untrue.
GNOME2 work for some and not for others. It is great that we have maintainers in the openSUSE project that provide choices other than the two major desktops that are integrated very well, Xfce, LXDE....
I think the choice insufficient now. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org