On 29.09.2015 11:12, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:44:13 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 29.09.2015 10:05, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:13:47 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 29.09.2015 um 08:06 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
Interestingly, it seems that Coolo is the one who updated many of such perl packages. Coolo, are these packages left intentionally? If so, can we put some marks in the list for avoiding confusion?
I can't offer any marks, no.
Well, you answered only a half of questions. Are these perl-* packages left intentionally excluded from Leap?
Ah, you mean if I actively did nothing about perl packages in Leap? No, I only did passively nothing about perl packages - as everyone else ;(
Max submitted every package in Factory that built against Leap and from what I remember every perl package in there was approved. That means to me, the rest of the packages just didn't build for Leap.
Thanks for clarification. So what's the next step for fixing these? Ping maintainers more aggressively?
Our perl modules are maintained by a bot and I'm really not interested in having all of this cpan stuff in Leap. But if you have a specific perl package at hands you need, submit it and make sure you also submit its dependencies. But be warned: perl modules are a mess - e.g. devel:openQA:42 contains all the perl modules Ludwig needed to get openQA installed on Leap. Those might be actually good candidates to submit Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org