On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 20:38 -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El 22/04/13 20:30, Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger escribió:
of course, now everybody will claim how bad it is to fix bugs which people rely on;
No, I wont claim that, in fact I would argue against keeping any bug on which people relies on (known as "backwards compatibility")
I should have excluded you from the list of everybody...
this mail was not meant to start anything like this...
merely as a heads-up if you run across similar weird checks...
The only way forward is to fix the broken checks...
Do you have a list of failing packages to help ?
I think the ones in Factory 'failing' I probably got about all (simply look at weird failures in Factory which are around 3 weeks old). the 'tricky' part will be packages that 'silently failed over the detection' of a feature and did not fail... Those are much harder to find. yate was one of the lucky ones having an explicit files section, which made it fail.. a typical /dir/to/files/ would have silently hidden this one for example. Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org