1 Nov
2013
1 Nov
'13
23:17
On 2013-11-01 23:45, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Am 01.11.2013 12:26, schrieb Ruediger Meier:
is running since 8 hours now and it has printed only 120MB text yet. That's only 4K/s. Is this normal?
Let me guess: journal on a normal (non-ssd) disk?
Obviously it is not designed for such outdated hardware ;-) The file fragmentation of the journal files and the performance of the "database" is absolutely totally horrible. It gets slightly better once you dedicate a fast SSD to the journal ;)
Bad programming, IMHO. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 12.3 x86_64 "Dartmouth" at Telcontar)