Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El 11/08/14 a las #4, David Haller escribi�:
So, what is incorrect on the linked page?
Everything.
You just contradicted yourself. In court they would call this perjury. You responded earlier to day to david, about this quote on that page: Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El 11/08/14 a las #4, David Haller wrote:
==== 9. systemd is designed with glibc in mind, and doesn't take kindly to supporting other libcs all that much[10]. In general, the systemd developers' idea of a standard libc is one that has bug-for-bug compatibility with glibc.
Yes, this is because only one thing is supported, one kernel, one libc, ...I cannot overstate how much I support this and is an idea that should be widely imitated.
Not only, do you say it is correct, but you hail its mono-culture design. Yet you claim everything on the page is incorrect. And you wonder why no one believes what the systemd fanatics say? You are picking up LP's bad habits. The same is true for more than one of LP's "anti-myth" pages... Looks like truth will be ongoing, collateral, damage for systemd fans. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org