On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 12:37 +0000, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
No, you should fix LLVM/clang on ppc64 if it's broken there.
Thanks for the hint. At a second look, clang8 does indeed exist for ppc64. But it's clang8 = 8.0.1, and libqt5-qttools-doc requires clang8 = 8.0.0, because of this code in the spec file: # qdoc hardcodes clang include paths: boo#1109367, QTBUG-70687 %requires_eq clang%(rpm -q --qf '%''{version}' clang-devel | cut -d. -f1) libqt5-qttools apparently hasn't been rebuild with clang8-8.0.1 because of a build failure on July 30th (!). The last successful build was on June 28th. At first sight, the current build failure seems to be LTO related ("undefined reference to `LTHUNK9.lto_priv.2'"). Currently the package is blocked, one needs to have patience for ppc64. I've opened bug 1148374. Regards Martin