On 02/04/2011 05:40 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dave Plater <davejplater@gmail.com> wrote:
On 02/04/2011 12:15 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
A fedora member told me that Redhat is trying to silently bash some licenses even though they are OSI accepted licenses.
Jörg
Maybe if you reworded the above statement to : "A fedora member told me that Redhat is dissatisfied with some of the OSI accepted licenses and are making moves in the background to have them changed." Your statement would have more credibility.
So you believe that an incorrect statement would give more credibility?
This looks strange, but is seems to be aligned with the way some people act in cdrtools related discussions.....
Jörg
So Redhat have a big hammer and they are bashing a license. I suppose this would be possible with those tin bicycle and dog licenses that existed long ago. Dave P -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org