"DL/D" == Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar <dimstar@opensuse.org> writes:
DL/D> On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 10:32 +0100, Luca Beltrame wrote:
Il 03/12/21 09:27, Togan Muftuoglu ha scritto:
Before I make a bug report, I want to understand the thinking
From https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/934377:
iso-codes alone isn't very useful without its translations and causes test failures in some dependent packages (eg: kitinerary).
DL/D> I assume that is an over-generalisation, based on the test suite of one DL/D> single package that tests translations. DL/D> Most users, running on English systems, will not ever care for the DL/D> translations. iso-codes itself is useful without translations in such a DL/D> system. DL/D> iso-codes-lang has relevant supplements on the locales, so that users DL/D> installing in other languages than Enlgish will get it auto-installed. DL/D> And all that is also the reason why DL/D> https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/934377 is not accepted yet. Interesting there is an accepted request https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/934383 Your comment about request 934377 and accepting 934383 are IMO conflicting eachother