Am 14.04.21 um 22:16 schrieb Luca Beltrame:
In data mercoledì 14 aprile 2021 14:46:24 CEST, Ben Greiner ha scritto:
As mentioned before, I would favor devel:languages:python:pyqt. I volunteer to participate in maintaining the project, but of course it is at the discretion of the existing maintainers. I'm not sure if I worded it correctly, but I was in agreement with d:l:p:pyqt.
Despite repeated inquiries, Matej is still vetoing d:l:p:pyqt. [1] * SIP and PyQt[56] are not from the same developers as Qt or KDE * SIP (python-sip) has nothing to do with KDE:Qt* * PyQt[56] is the main but not the only consumer of SIP - Thus, following Simon's argument [2], python-qt5*, python-PyQt6* and python-sip* should be in the same devel project. * Qt Libraries are packaged into separate projects for each minor version. * The most recent version of PyQt5 compiles with any Qt5 version. The most recent version of PyQt6 compiles with any Qt6 version. - Thus, putting python-PyQt6 into a KDE:Qt6.X project would be wrong With the bullet points above, one could argue to put everything into devel:languages:python, but that collides with Matej's veto and Simon's argument. If we can't get d:l:p:pyqt, IMHO the next best thing would be KDE:Qt:PyQt. Ben [1] https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/message/... (which is a reply to an off-list message) [2] https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/message/...