data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/551c0/551c0c0cc7e288d2e22b4c873d4b0406518424b3" alt=""
On 24 April 2017 at 10:18, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de> wrote:
On Monday 2017-04-24 09:58, Richard Brown wrote:
On 24 April 2017 at 09:35, Rüdiger Meier <sweet_f_a@gmx.de> wrote:
Who is actually responsible for setting up the Leap repos, Ludwig?
Ludwig is responsible, and the Board consulted with him and he approved the idea of Leap 15 before we considered it with any seriousness
Well the thread should show that Ludwig should not be the _only_ technical guy to consult on this one. Still waiting on your response to that numbers should be (strictly) monotonically increasing for a particular product name.
Ludwig was not the _only_ technical guide consulted, but obviously the most important one given that Leap is _his_ distribution to release. If you're referring to yourself as a "technical guy", I do not see any email from you asking any questions, nor making statements which would imply we should have consulted with you. The one email I think you might be referring to you said you were losing faith in the board, followed by saying "Nobody cares about version numbers", followed by the suggestion "if SLE jumps backwards in version numbers, I'll consider it for Leap too." These are things the Board already considered, so I'm afraid to say you are not bringing anything new to the table. Given the plan for Leap 15 from now on will be to make the most of this version sync and stick with matching SLE versions for the indefinite future I took your statement as mostly agreeing with the direction of travel, and your hurtful comment about the board as a frustration about how we got there, which I sympathise with but I certainly had no intention of addressing publicly. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org