Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
On 28/12/11 16:01, Per Jessen wrote:
Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
On 28/12/11 11:49, Michal Kubeček wrote:
On the other hand, it brings a lot of problems and complicates things that used to be simple and easy.
Yeah, simple and easy... did you mean obscure, undocumented, racy and impossible to verify in large scale ?
Hasn't been much of a problem so far. Or do you have a list of applicable bug reports?
Try the following, create a program that is able to figure out what exactly init scripts do, if it really is what the packager intended.
Also try auditing all uses of /tmp , sed , awk, etc ensuring people are using them correctly.
Like I said, none of this has been much of an issue so far - I agree it could be desirable to verify some of this, but that is a pretty poor argument in this context.
Some features aren't provided at all and
when people point it out, the answer is "you shouldn't want them because systemd doesn't provide them"
Well, people is asking for fairly ridiculous things.
Oh yeah. Like output from init scripts. Yup.
Im not talking about incompatibilities or bugs, I am talking about requests that ask for systemd to manage services that do not provide proper exit status codes.
It is the other way around - systemd wants/needs to manage those services, but somehow systemd does not accommodate them. (and they were there first). -- Per Jessen, Zürich (0.7°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org