On 9/6/2012 5:08 PM, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar wrote:
Quoting "Brian K. White" <brian@aljex.com>:
I'm sorry that you don't understand logic and consider it pedantry, but this is technology not art. Things are, or are not. They are not "understood". A line of code only does what it says, and nothing else. Manuals and specifications are written the way they are very carefully. It's essentially the same as "legalese". Anything that is not explicitly or even implicitly defined, is left that way deliberately and consciously, not through omission, and it does not mean that those undefined things actually mean something you happen to imagine.
Can you please start a new thread "bitching about systemd", as THIS thread is about the discussion about openSUSE 12.3 and using systemd as 'the main targeted' init daemon.
Thanks a lot.
Dominique
No. It belongs exactly here. If you don't like it, then don't help propose removing sysv-init before it's role is properly fulfilled by something else. -- bkw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org