Hi all, There's currently a tiny issue regarding the submission of Cinnamon identified by Coolo and Vincent (assuming). The Muffin package (a fork of mutter) typelib has the same name that mutter's. Currently everything seems to work, and though this library is internal to mutter/muffin it might bring issues in the future. This was taken upstream which will fix it, but not yet for the next release (due to the large number of changes required). My question is, since currently (maybe out of pure luck) we haven't any report of real issues, could we allow this in Factory until it gets fixed (most likely before the release 12.2) ? Furthermore... the typelib package naming policy. In the case of muffin/cinnamon, the typelib is internal and not public, which eventually falls out of the current typelib policies (since we are only considering public typelibs in the policy). Could this be allowed also: - typelib(Meta) = 3.0 Can we have the package named as typelib-3_0-libmuffin-0_0 ? And I would maybe suggest that internal typelib's could be packaged that way, so we have a distinction just by looking at the package name we know that: * libmuffin has a internal typelib (we don't know if it's Meta or anything else, but we can easilly find out with "rpm -qp --provides package"). Comments, suggestions... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org