On 2012/09/03 16:38 (GMT-0300) Cristian Rodríguez composed:
Felix Miata composed:
Along the same lines, Grub2 wasn't/isn't ready to be default either.
We are talking about systemd, not grub.
Broadly speaking the discussion is about replacing another very important mature product or system component with an immature and/or unpolished putative replacement. Grub2, KMS, KDE4 & systemd are or were all alike in this manner. When decisions to change important paradigms are made it's generally known in advance to be change that requires a disproportionate amount of resources to implement. Complaining about "limited" resources is out of place - the problem was expected at the outset. New does not automatically equate to better. Too often opposite turns out to be the case when hindsight proves implementation turned out to be premature. My hope is that someday there will be a release with no major changes, where development resources are focused on eradicating bugs and polishing away installation and UI impediments, something that 99.7% works as delivered rather than requiring updates the very day it's announced as an official release. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org