On 11/1/19 6:11 PM, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Am 01.11.19 um 01:12 schrieb Simon Lees:
Many consider that the state the internal management of groups would equally indicate that it had failed.
[...]
Beyond that we have years of evidence that leaving it to maintainers, many of who don't strongly care has lead to a big mess.
Die the idea ever come to your mind that this crazy rpmlint check that forced people to select totally useless groups might have a slight impact on the creation of this "big mess" and the resulting "failure"?
Yep
I guess that not many people will argue that the previous group system was good. Especially not the selection of the available and usable groups.
Jan / we are discussing a different approach now (just in case you have not noticed yet).
I am well aware of the discussions of new approaches, and it seemed to us that the new approaches would be best implemented if they stored there data somewhere else that among other things is translatable. But I get the feeling that i'm starting to have to repeat myself here. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B