-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:25:11 +0200 Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz> wrote:
On Friday 28 of August 2015 11:11:37 Jan Matejka wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:35:55 +0200 Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz> wrote:
OK, I'm pretty sure does consume _less_ memory. However, I seriously doubt you can prove to me the difference is (except for artificially crafted examples) big enough to outweigh the drawbacks of i586.
You can observe halved memory consumption on lightly loaded machines regardless of application.
No, I can't. Smaller, yes, but not halved, not by far.
Yes. Halved. This is empiric data. Though I have been informed by OSukup the consumption reduction is different between multilib and nomultilib, which I don't remember which one I used. - -- Jan Matějka | QA Engineer for Maintenance SUSE LINUX s.r.o. | https://www.suse.com/ GPG: A33E F5BC A9F6 DAFD 2021 6FB6 3EBF D45B EEB6 CA8B -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJV4C0OAAoJEIN+7RD5ejah3QoH/1QenJ/GqEk7CRxo6/yitBKp QYB+pB/F0oHEy2fpJ+M5pP8kTPN/xS2WUaM5LItVW9omH/GGauFONoal1THtikq3 iLKYtNbPqDl0gSm1buhKakmFmeLKMn9p9e84YXjb7m38LdBAig16ab6dAhpKeZ57 NNbLMru7cEbiQ45ZGbdvUkLAdqV9FY3eW+12iT+04KakYlrUX8WN1CTZWxGMy4vs u5oOXuL15RJpK+eWHK5K1OJu3yzV4S6nLW0Q5VknGJMOSasrrZ3hWsSznRUOIMRK n1MWsz/Xpw8n5jt7QK6kn41tkWnn/bRWXT12+xX9jzFO1Bvyq30rejy2kAhXYz0= =nMtm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----