On 16 June 2015 at 17:47, Robert Schweikert <rjschwei@suse.com> wrote:
In a "thread renaming" post we have had the following suggestion:
* openSUSE Oak
"""" So how about Oak? It's a solid tree, it fits with the green theme and it will give us:
* openSUSE Tumbleweed * openSUSE Oak """"
Sorry but why re-name anything? What on earth is wrong with what we have currently - openSUSE $VERSION & openSUSE Tumbleweed? The latter is well advertised as a rolling release so no number or anything is needed. The former uses the SLE Sources as a base and shows the similarity to its enterprise brother/cousin, we discussed at oSC15 using 42 as the name for the project in OBS and using it as the base for the release numbering. So as we were planning on releasing roughly at the same time as SLE12 SP1, then we would label it openSUSE 42.1; with the major number matching the SLE number denoting the tree from which it is spawned and the minor number lining up with the corresponding service pack. I don't get the fascination with "fixing" something that isn't broken. Nobody cared for the code names for each release since forever, what makes this any different. Lengthening the name is pointless and causes issues with macros etc. Regards, The Grumpy Curmudgeon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org