On 29 September 2012 20:49, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de> wrote:
On Saturday 2012-09-29 20:20, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Exactly. A system without libjpeg.so.62 often is not considered "working stuff".
This is about applications that you cannot recompile.
Is OBS suddenly supporting binary blobs?
You know that there are other sources of software than the OBS? There's even such a thing as proprietary software.
You know that distros generally did not, and do not, bother with keeping old stuff around?
Is this case we are not talking about old stuff. libjpeg.so.6 is the default soname in the latest version of libjpeg-turbo. As already said LSB defines libjpeg.so.6 and Fedora doesn't provide a libjpeg.so.8. For a third party developer it only makes sense to distribute binaries linking against libjpeg.so.6. Since I didn't receive an explanation about why the change was done I will create a submit request to provide both libjpeg.so.6 and libjpeg.so.8 versions of libjpeg-turbo. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org