On Thursday 28 November 2013 16:33:19 Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a. Dimstar wrote:
Quoting Adrian Schröter <adrian@suse.de>:
Am Donnerstag, 28. November 2013, 16:18:57 schrieb Dominique
Leuenberger a.k.a. Dimstar:
Quoting Adrian Schröter <adrian@suse.de>:
My hope is that we can developer some kind of objective QA measurements in future for this. Eg. X server is not only compiling, but even
starting :)
Or bluez update does not break the tools for one of the desktops like it is even the case for openSUSE:13.1 released version.
Please, stop using this example! This was CONSCIOUSLY decided, HERE on the Factory mailing lists.
Well, I do not want to spoil this discussion with that, but it comes to the point where we need to define our quality criterias before and follow them.
And such criterias must be objective and should not be driven by current technical problems if we want to have the user acceptance.
I didn't say it was necessary the *right* decision.. I only stated it was a conscious one. And as such defeated by all those automatics.
Yeap, and while it might have been painful, it is woefully off-topic here, so let's move on indeed ;-) These threads are already growing big and hairy as-is... /J
Dominique