Le vendredi 24 mai 2013 à 10:46 +0200, Ludwig Nussel a écrit :
Am 21.05.2013 16:43, schrieb Frederic Crozat:
Le mardi 21 mai 2013 à 16:35 +0200, Ludwig Nussel a écrit :
Am 21.05.2013 15:33, schrieb Frederic Crozat:
Le mardi 21 mai 2013 à 14:57 +0200, Ludwig Nussel a écrit :
Am 17.05.2013 15:51, schrieb Frederic Crozat:
Le vendredi 17 mai 2013 à 15:41 +0200, Per Jessen a écrit : > When I tried Sysrq-B on a fresh M1 install, I was informed that the > sysrq function is disabled.
It is coming from systemd upstream default:
kernel.sysrq = 16 (ie SYNC only).
If we (openSUSE) decide a different setting, we can change this in the default file in systemd.
The defaults we have since years are already in /lib/sysctl.d/sysctl.conf
Are you fine if I merge this file content in the systemd default file ?
One the one hand it doesn't really matter where the file comes from. On the other hand what about just not packaging it in systemd?
I can make the "systemd" defaults empty if you prefer. I have no strong opinions here.
Yes, I think we should do it that way and maybe move our defaults from procps to aaa_base.
One remaining question is about hardlink protection (http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/64493.html ) which is enabled in systemd default sysctl. Should I keep it there until sysctl default are moved to aaa_base ? -- Frederic Crozat <fcrozat@suse.com> SUSE -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org