On 12/03/2013 11:52 AM, Sascha Peilicke wrote:
On Tuesday 03 December 2013 10:41:59 Michal Hrusecky wrote:
Sascha Peilicke - 10:17 3.12.13 wrote:
On the other hand, there's udev, which doesn't break builds but peoples running systems. So staging udev wouldn't reveal anything until people actually test the staged udev. Well, apart from staging projects, there is need QA part in the proposed workflow ;-) Ah ok, I have to admit that this thread became TL;DR for me already. So who will do the QA part?
In the proposal, that would be the "QA Team". With heavy usage of a revamped openQA.
Before we propose anything there we should ask our stable release maintenance guys how pending updates are tested (if at all).
[...]
I think you are correct that we have to bring the packagers into the fix-it boat. But let's not be overambitious, this won't solve everything :-) Well, this should solve the failing packages in Factory and make Factory buildable/rebuildable all the time. To make it stable and working, we need QA, that was in another box :-D What we can improve though is the notification part of it. While we have coolo's reminder mails about new breakage, that's sometimes still overlooked by people (like me).
We are working in a heavy redesign of notifications in OBS. Expect good news about it in the short term. Cheers -- Ancor González Sosa openSUSE Team at Suse Linux GmbH -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org