On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 01:38:32PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
To me, that underscores a deficiency in our approach, then. What makes it difficult for people to use Tumbleweed that they need Leap with a motley of devel project repositories enabled?
For me, that's the very principle of Tumbleweed: it's a rolling distribution so that big and backwards incompatible changes which can and do break things can come with _any_ update. Not everyone wants that and I certainly don't. I do have one Tumbleweed system but it's one I do not depend on at all and which has been actually down since something like mid March. I wouldn't consider installing Tumbleweed on a system I need for my work. I want latest versions of a small subset of packages and I'm ready to deal with issues with these selected packages; but that doesn't mean I want a full bleeding edge distribution where _anything_ can be upgraded to a new major version at any update. To be honest, for most of the distribution, I would rather appreciate the exact opposite: the original, more conservative, design of Leap. Because except for the packages inherited from SLE, most of Leap currently works more like the pre-Leap openSUSE, i.e. not distinguishing between major and minor versions of the distribution and just picking the latest version from Factory on every Leap release. Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org