Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/V... Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-01/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210227/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 13909 (-20) build-tried: 13900 (-22) build-failed: 81 (+51) build-n-a: 135 (+5) build-succeeded: 13684 (-78) build-official-failed+na: 393 (+99) build-compare-failed: 433 (-3) build-compare-succeeded: 13251 (-75) verify-failed: 497 (-11) verified-semi-reproducible: 12871 (-75) bit-by-bit-identical: 13119 (-79) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 565 (+1) not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 565 (+1) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210227/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210227/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 3 were in ring0 45 were in ring1 That makes it 48/3247 => 1.48 % which is below the overall average of 433/13684 => 3.16 % 565/13684 => 4.13 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible newly unreproducible core packages: containerd: becomes reproducible with BuildRequires: go1.15 https://github.com/golang/go/issues/42159 python-numpy: .pyc files are nondeterministic again/still newly reproducible core packages: kopete: might still be affected by https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-83186 but 1-bit nondeterminism can go unnoticed rubygem-nokogiri darix fixed https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180528