On Mon, 21 May 2007, M9. wrote:
Well, since i have noticed the enormous difference in performance and speed, i will allways use them, if possible. I realy can not understand that this huge difference, between 1 large partition and several smaller ones, is not noticed among you people..
If one would read the manual, that comes along with SuSE, it is
Uhh, there you got me. :-)
recommended to use partitions... It is obvious, that those who write the manual, are not the same as those who use the system...
Maybe the absence of a good partitioner, is the reason, no one uses them;-)
Clear to me is that the problems that arise now, are caused by the absence of a good partitioner, and the knowledge, that a good partitioner is a must, for those who take their OS serious, because even M$ knows that it needs room to install, and offers all you need in a simplyfied version of fdisk, to delete, make and format partition(s), as many as you like. But afterwards, you are allways able to change the size, delete, move or create new partitions, if there is the need for it.
To partition, is the basis for a useable OS. To be able to change the available room, is a must to keep the system tuned.
I can not understand that this is not understood;-)
All I need is a system partition for the os and a large data partition for me to create a mess.
Just imagine what happens: all files get all over the disk, which makes a mess, and makes time to find the file you want longer. Cann't you see this?
Isn't that what's beagle for? No? :-) Steffen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org