On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Hugo Costelha wrote:
It seems wuite intuitive to me. I also prefer longer names, if they are easier to remember and much easier to get some sense out of them, which I think is the case here.
It does not take longer time to get a sense for a shorter word. But directory listings have a chance to be readable and submitting URLs has a chance not to get broken if the path names are short.
the length of
/pub/opensuse/distribution/openSUSE-10.2/repositories/source-non-oss/
already is really crazy and a pain for everyone who needs to spell or type it - a full line already, and still missing protocol prefix, hostname, arch suffix and filename.
/pub/suse/i386/9.3/ was a good path naming and length.
+1 /pub/opensuse/10.2 would be enough. Of course 10.2 is a distribution and repeating the opensuse does not help understanding the structure. I also thing repositories is not needed at all. -- Andreas Vetter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org