Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2020-10/msg00328.html Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-10/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201127/ yesterday and rb-stats are: total-packages: 13709 (+139) build-tried: 13698 (+137) build-failed: 35 (-6) build-n-a: 129 (-4) build-succeeded: 13534 (+147) build-official-failed+na: 189 (-5) build-compare-failed: 417 (+5) build-compare-succeeded: 13117 (+142) verify-failed: 518 (+8) verified-semi-reproducible: 12784 (+261) bit-by-bit-identical: 12990 (+135) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 537 (+5) not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 544 (+12) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201127/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201127/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 3 were in ring0 49 were in ring1 That makes it 52/3215 => 1.62 % which is below the overall average of 417/13534 => 3.08 % 537/13534 => 3.97 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible noteworthy findings: procmail https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/850841 verification error from preinstallimage that had different groups eigen3 docs can build reproducibly with new doxygen newly unreproducible packages in ring1: cilium filesystem readdir order issues apache-commons-codec javadoc issues go1.15 still suffering from parallelism-induced buildid variations that might be fixed when building with go1.15 https://github.com/golang/go/issues/42159 Ciao Bernhard M.