On Wednesday 20 August 2008 03:22:25 am Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Mittwoch 20 August 2008 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
It is not meant to be used by people who want "that package", because it'll definitely be removed from "Contrib-testing" at some point: either when it's stable enough for "Contrib-stable", or when it's deemed not good enough for "Contrib-stable" (not actively developed/supported, too buggy, foreporting nightmare, side-effects, ...).
Does that cast another light on "Contrib-testing" in your eyes or are you still opposed to it ?
But then you would need everyone to be able to write to that repo, that sounds uglier than a wiki page to me.
But I understand your proposal now - and I think it's different to what Richard proposed.
No, besides the name the proposals are the same. Contrib/unstable should be a staging area. (Much like we have this extra patches repository where patches are put early)
Is it possible to keep naming consistent with other names in opensuse. Contrib : Third party contributions, not part of official distro, but following distro development and release cycle, so: Contrib/11.0 Contrib/Factory Testing area will be Contrib/Factory, and the rest frozen after the release. Is there something that I miss in discussion? Do we look for the naming that is closer to common language (testing vs. factory). -- Regards, Rajko http://en.opensuse.org/Portal needs helpful hands. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org