Am 27.09.2015 um 13:30 schrieb Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar:
On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 22:54 +0300, Robert Munteanu wrote:
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> wrote:
- icinga
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Leap:42.1:Staging:ad i:32 . Not sure what's missing to accept the submission though.
https://build.opensuse.org/project/staging_projects/openSUSE:Leap:42.1/ adi:32
Gives some interesting idea here: Missing reviews: nagios-plugins-mysql_health by server:monitoring, nagios-plugins- mysql_health by nagios-plugins-mysql_health, logwatch by server:monitoring, logwatch by logwatch, monitoring-plugins-smart by server:monitoring, monitoring-plugins-smart by monitoring-plugins- smart, monitoring-plugins-diskio by server:monitoring, monitoring- plugins-diskio by monitoring-plugins-diskio, nagstamon by server:monitoring, nagstamon by nagstamon, collectd by server:monitoring, collectd by collectd, monitoring-plugins-clamav by server:monitoring, and monitoring-plugins-clamav by monitoring-plugins- clamav.
so in fact: the current package maintainers are asked to commit maintaining this package for the life-time of Leap 42.1... there is no reason to add a package that won't have an active maintainer, right?
Actually I don't get this argument but probably just don't understand. icinga is in SLE12 logwatch is in SLE12 (probably not the others) So was the point that icinga does not make sense w/o every single plugin from above? Because I understood that SLE12 packages are implicitely maintained anyway w/o any commitment from the Factory maintainer? Wolfgang -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org