On Friday 02 September 2011 18:53:46 Vincent Untz wrote:
And we (those running factory of opensuse) were forced to move to gnome 3 unconditionally. Unlike with KDE 3 -> 4 move. Or we might switch to other environment. I chose the latter and won't switch back. I have enough of other work than switching DMs.
I'm sad to hear this. Unfortunately, I don't think it would have been possible to do things differently: there was no way to keep GNOME 2 and GNOME 3 at the same time with our current (read: extremely limited)
May be I am asking a wrong question, but why the resources are so limited? I heard that Novell is a company that operates with billions dollars and their business is SUSE-centric...
resources. I'm also interested to hear what's not working for people in the fallback mode compared to a GNOME 2 experience.
If you (general you, not just Jiri) are not happy with how GNOME is developed in openSUSE, a good first step is to join the opensuse-gnome mailing list or #opensuse-gnome channel, and start discussing how to improve things. We're not horrible people hating the world. At least I hope we're not :-)
Last week there was an interview with Jon McCann which was very disappointing for many people. He called to reject any patches and plugins that could make Gnome3 more Gnome2-like and suggested to those who are disappointed to just use another DE -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org