1 Oct
2002
1 Oct
'02
14:57
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 2:10 pm, Grainge, Derek wrote:
Nor need 'open' imply web based: why not gcc + Crygwin?
Non web based is harder to sell because usually the developer would have to produce binaries for all platforms, and you'll never convince a Windows developer that gcc cygwin is the future :) Cheers -- Phil Driscoll