[obs submit-request 7614] openSUSE:Factory:Contrib/libfwbuilder: created by worldcitizen
home:worldcitizen/libfwbuilder -> openSUSE:Factory:Contrib/libfwbuilder https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=libfwbuilder&project=home:worldcitizen https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=libfwbuilder&project=openSUSE:Factory:Contrib Description: please add a 'libfwbuilder' to Contrib Source revision md5: upload To REVIEW against the previous version: osc submitreq show --diff 7614 To ACCEPT the request: osc submitreq accept 7614 --message="reviewed ok." To DECLINE the request: osc submitreq decline 7614 --message="declined for reason xyz (see ... for background / policy / ...)." To REVOKE the request: osc submitreq revoke 7614 --message="retracted because ..., sorry / thx / see better version ..." -- Hermes messaging (http://hermes.opensuse.org) openSUSE Build Service (https://build.opensuse.org/) Collaboration: http://en.opensuse.org/Build_Service/Collaboration -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 10:15:06AM +0000, joop_boonen@web.de wrote:
home:worldcitizen/libfwbuilder -> openSUSE:Factory:Contrib/libfwbuilder
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=libfwbuilder&project=home:worldcitizen https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=libfwbuilder&project=openSUSE:Factory:Contrib
Description: please add a 'libfwbuilder' to Contrib
Hi all, the package does not conform to 'shared library packaging policy' [1] What do you think about the following patch that tries to fix it? It only renames the package to end with its soname which is enough to make RPMLint happy. Does it have any drawbacks or is it OK? Index: libfwbuilder.spec =================================================================== --- libfwbuilder.spec (revision upload) +++ libfwbuilder.spec (working copy) @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ # norootforbuild Summary: Firewall Builder API -Name: libfwbuilder +Name: libfwbuilder8 Version: 3.0.3 Release: 0 License: GPL2 @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Group: System Environment/Libraries %endif Url: http://www.fwbuilder.org/ -Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 +Source: libfwbuilder-%{version}.tar.bz2 Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root BuildRequires: libxml2-devel, libxslt-devel, openssl-devel %if 0%{?suse_version} @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ %description Firewall Builder 3.0 API library and compiler framework -%files -n libfwbuilder +%files %defattr(-,root,root) %dir %{_docdir}/%{name}/ %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}/* @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ %prep -%setup +%setup -n libfwbuilder-%{version} %build %if 0%{?mandriva_version} > 2006 =================================================================== [1] http://en.opensuse.org/Shared_Library_Packaging_Policy TIA -- Best regards / s pozdravem Petr Uzel, Packages maintainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: puzel@suse.cz Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 964 190 00 Prague 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 02:46:15PM +0100, Petr Uzel wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 10:15:06AM +0000, joop_boonen@web.de wrote:
home:worldcitizen/libfwbuilder -> openSUSE:Factory:Contrib/libfwbuilder
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=libfwbuilder&project=home:worldcitizen https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=libfwbuilder&project=openSUSE:Factory:Contrib
Description: please add a 'libfwbuilder' to Contrib
Hi all,
the package does not conform to 'shared library packaging policy' [1]
What do you think about the following patch that tries to fix it? It only renames the package to end with its soname which is enough to make RPMLint happy. Does it have any drawbacks or is it OK?
Another question: if the library is used only by fwbuilder (both packages have the same version), is it worth fixing at all? -- Best regards / s pozdravem Petr Uzel, Packages maintainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: puzel@suse.cz Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 964 190 00 Prague 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
Another question: if the library is used only by fwbuilder (both packages have the same version), is it worth fixing at all?
I believe that strict sticking to the policy in the case when only one package uses the library does not make much sense - I have accepted the package meanwhile. Anicka -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org
participants (3)
-
anicka＠suse.cz -
joop_boonen＠web.de -
Petr Uzel