![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/bff5f3a982c0eca43c2cf6e50e2daaff.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Le mercredi 11 février 2009, à 15:21 +0100, Michal Vyskocil a écrit :
On Friday 30 of January 2009 12:40:00 Henne Vogelsang wrote: I'm not sure that we want and need to be strict rule. Afaik only one community based distro has this policy - the Debian, but they have only *one* stable release at time. And Debian community (I'm talking about package maintainers especially) is probably more experienced and bigger than openSUSE, so why we want more annoying work (which backporting of fixes is) for openSUSE contributors than Debian?
Fedora is more close to openSUSE release cycle and it's also community opened and allow [1] the version update after release, so why not be able to do this in Contrib?
Actually, I think Fedora is the exception, not Debian :-) But maybe I'm wrong. I'm not opposed to version updates on a frozen branch, but this has to be very careful. It's really a matter of making sure it doesn't break anything.
BTW: I suggest adapt a Fedora Maintainers Policy [2] for Contrib, because those things needs to be written!
Nod. Actually, it makes sense for openSUSE in general, not just Contrib ;-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-contrib+help@opensuse.org