Hi Christian,
And why is the check for SLES11 SP3 in a good state (C:O:G and C:O:M) although the openvswitch package is not usable?
What makes you think that it is not really usable? Just because somebody checked in a broken version from some git branch that doesn't even build doesn't make the old, tested and working binaries go away. The old binaries were still there and are working fine (are even tested). Thats what the test is checking for (if the latest published package binaries are dependency wise installable), and it succeeded.
If there is a cinder volume plugin (for example) that requires ceph
The volume driver for Rados Block Devices is included in the Cinder packages and there is at least on call to the ceph CLI in _get_mon_addrs().
Isn't that the one that requires a Rados enabled libvirt, which we don't have yet ? Or am I mixing it up?
I'm not sure how we should test (for example) C:O:G if there is no fixed version of openvswitch and ceph inside.
First of all, the openvswitch version in C:O:G is working fine. About ceph I don't know the current state of affairs, I just asked the mere question if there is something wrong with the ceph version in "filesystems". Thats all :-) Greetings, Dirk -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-cloud+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-cloud+owner@opensuse.org