On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:05 PM Cory McIntire wrote:

Hello, just an update, this appears to be an Almalinux8 issue instead of CentOS 8, I’ve reached out to CloudLinux but I am not sure they maintain that on openSUSE OBS or not.

It is maintained by the openSUSE Build Service team, not by anyone at AlmaLinux. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!

On Dienstag, 21. Juni 2022, 18:10:10 CEST Julio Gonzalez wrote:

I can confirm I see the same issue at the Uyuni Client Tools for EL8 (Alma, Rocky, etc)

https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/systemsmanagement:Uyuni:Master:EL8-U...

In the end, OBS takes the packages from AlmaLinux itself: https://build.opensuse.org/projects/AlmaLinux:8/meta

So either something is really broken at the AlmaLinux repo, or something is broken when OBS tries to get the package from the repos?

I guess Adrian needs to have a look?

it seems more to be a problem that AlmaLinux has two different glibc-gconv-extra stacks in baseos and appstream. But in appstream is an older version requiring the not anymore existing glibc base packages. So, you must either de-prefer the appstream repository or talk to upstream to get that package removed from appstream repo.

On martes, 21 de junio de 2022 18:05:10 (CEST) Cory McIntire wrote:

...

Hello, just an update, this appears to be an Almalinux8 issue instead of CentOS 8, I’ve reached out to CloudLinux but I am not sure they maintain that on openSUSE OBS or not.

Thanks

From: Cory McIntire Date: Monday, June 20, 2022 at 11:19 AM To: buildservice@lists.opensuse.org Subject: CentOS 8 Unresolvable today? We are seeing the following issues with our local OBS that pulls from openSUSE.org servers:

nothing provides glibc(x86-64) = 2.28-189.1.el8 needed by glibc-gconv-extra, (got version 2.28-189.5.el8_6 provided by glibc), nothing provides glibc-common = 2.28-189.1.el8 needed by glibc-gconv-extra, (got version 2.28-189.5.el8_6)

It appears the problem is that glibc now has el8_6 in the new updated RPM and that might be causing the issues?

Is anyone else seeing this?

Regards, Cory McIntire | Lead – cPanel Security Team | Release Manager – EasyApache M +1 281.777.2705 | cory.mcintire@webpros.commailto:cory.mcintire@webpros.com | cPanel – a webpros company

-- Adrian Schroeter Build Infrastructure Project Manager SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstraße 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev

Hello Adrian, can you please update the order of the repos and put BaseOS higher than AppStream? That hopefully fixes it "globally". At least it fixed it on my local repos. https://build.opensuse.org/projects/AlmaLinux:8/meta Also I noticed that the AlmaLinux 8 repos show red triangles. Maybe the repos are not updating and that is the issue? https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/AlmaLinux:8 Thank you and best wishes, Stefan ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- Von: "Julio Gonzalez" An: "buildservice" , "Adrian Schröter" CC: "Cory McIntire" Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2022 16:45:58 Betreff: Re: CentOS 8 Unresolvable today? On miércoles, 22 de junio de 2022 8:50:12 (CEST) Adrian Schröter wrote:

On Dienstag, 21. Juni 2022, 18:10:10 CEST Julio Gonzalez wrote:

...

I can confirm I see the same issue at the Uyuni Client Tools for EL8 (Alma, Rocky, etc)

https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/systemsmanagement:Uyuni:Master:EL8 -Uyuni-Client-Tools

In the end, OBS takes the packages from AlmaLinux itself: https://build.opensuse.org/projects/AlmaLinux:8/meta

So either something is really broken at the AlmaLinux repo, or something is broken when OBS tries to get the package from the repos?

I guess Adrian needs to have a look?

it seems more to be a problem that AlmaLinux has two different glibc-gconv-extra stacks in baseos and appstream.

But in appstream is an older version requiring the not anymore existing glibc base packages.

So, you must either de-prefer the appstream repository or talk to upstream to get that package removed from appstream repo.

I am not sure how to do that? At the prjconfig?

...

On martes, 21 de junio de 2022 18:05:10 (CEST) Cory McIntire wrote:

...

Hello, just an update, this appears to be an Almalinux8 issue instead of CentOS 8, I’ve reached out to CloudLinux but I am not sure they maintain that on openSUSE OBS or not.

Thanks

From: Cory McIntire Date: Monday, June 20, 2022 at 11:19 AM To: buildservice@lists.opensuse.org Subject: CentOS 8 Unresolvable today? We are seeing the following issues with our local OBS that pulls from openSUSE.org servers:

nothing provides glibc(x86-64) = 2.28-189.1.el8 needed by glibc-gconv-extra, (got version 2.28-189.5.el8_6 provided by glibc), nothing provides glibc-common = 2.28-189.1.el8 needed by glibc-gconv-extra, (got version 2.28-189.5.el8_6)

It appears the problem is that glibc now has el8_6 in the new updated RPM and that might be causing the issues?

Is anyone else seeing this?

Regards, Cory McIntire | Lead – cPanel Security Team | Release Manager – EasyApache M +1 281.777.2705 | cory.mcintire@webpros.commailto:cory.mcintire@webpros.com | cPanel – a webpros company

-- Julio González Gil Release Engineer, SUSE Manager and Uyuni jgonzalez@suse.com

Wong Hoi Sing Edison wrote:

Reorder BaseOS > AppStream couldn't solve my problem, see https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:alvistack

However, this order is supposed to work, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102548#c8. Based on some internal discussions, I expect that we treat violations of the BaseOS > AppStream rule as content glitches that need to be fixed. Thanks, Florian

To whom it may concern, here is my repo setup for CentOS: <project name="home:alvistack"> <title/> <description/> <url>https://github.com/alvistack/</url> <person userid="alvistack" role="maintainer"/> <person userid="hswong3i" role="maintainer"/> <repository name="CentOS_9_Stream"> <path project="Fedora:EPEL:9" repository="standard"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-9:Stream" repository="crb"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-9:Stream" repository="standard"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-9:Stream" repository="baseos"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-9:Stream" repository="appstream"/> <arch>x86_64</arch> </repository> <repository name="CentOS_8_Stream"> <path project="Fedora:EPEL:8" repository="standard"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-8:Stream" repository="powertools"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-8:Stream" repository="devel"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-8:Stream" repository="extras"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-8:Stream" repository="standard"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-8:Stream" repository="baseos"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-8:Stream" repository="appstream"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-8" repository="update"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-8" repository="standard"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-8" repository="baseos"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-8" repository="appstream"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-8" repository="powertools"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-8" repository="devel"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-8" repository="extras"/> <arch>x86_64</arch> </repository> <repository name="CentOS_7"> <path project="Fedora:EPEL:7" repository="standard"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-7" repository="extras"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-7" repository="update"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-7" repository="standard"/> <arch>x86_64</arch> </repository> </project>