Hello,
whether I add "Packager" in a spec file or not, rpmlint complains in both cases. One time because of hardcoding. The other time because it is missing.
Could this please be fixed?
What I would like to see is that the buildservice-email-address also used in the GPG key of the repository is automatically copied into the spec (like e.g. changelog or revision).
Is this possible (thought that would not fix the hardcoding error message) or can the name+email be added in the build command directly?
Ciao
Hello,
whether I add "Packager" in a spec file or not, rpmlint complains in both cases. One time because of hardcoding. The other time because it is missing.
Could this please be fixed?
What I would like to see is that the buildservice-email-address also used in the GPG key of the repository is automatically copied into the spec (like e.g. changelog or revision).
Is this possible (thought that would not fix the hardcoding error message) or can the name+email be added in the build command directly?
Now, where rpmlint is activated for openSUSE 11.0 and Factory, could this issue please be fixed. Shouldn't be so complicated.
Ciao
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 01:33:06PM +0200, Dirk St?cker wrote:
Hello,
whether I add "Packager" in a spec file or not, rpmlint complains in both cases. One time because of hardcoding. The other time because it is missing.
Could this please be fixed?
The problem is being tracked with bug report #401971 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401971
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Richard Bos wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 01:33:06PM +0200, Dirk St?cker wrote:
Hello,
whether I add "Packager" in a spec file or not, rpmlint complains in both cases. One time because of hardcoding. The other time because it is missing.
Could this please be fixed?
The problem is being tracked with bug report #401971 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401971
Which does not mean it will get fixed. Till my now my success for bug fixes on this mailinglist was much higher than on the bugtracker.
Ciao
On Thursday 03 July 2008, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
The problem is being tracked with bug report #401971 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401971
Which does not mean it will get fixed. Till my now my success for bug fixes on this mailinglist was much higher than on the bugtracker.
There is no good reason for that. There are some reasons against it, like bugreports that are only sent to the mailing lists tend to be forgotten if they're not fixed immediately.
Greetings, Dirk
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@opensuse.org
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Dirk Mueller wrote:
The problem is being tracked with bug report #401971 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401971
Which does not mean it will get fixed. Till my now my success for bug fixes on this mailinglist was much higher than on the bugtracker.
There is no good reason for that. There are some reasons against it, like bugreports that are only sent to the mailing lists tend to be forgotten if they're not fixed immediately.
Hah. I'm long enough in this business. I resent the bug reports :-)
Ciao
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Dirk Mueller wrote:
The problem is being tracked with bug report #401971 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401971
Which does not mean it will get fixed. Till my now my success for bug fixes on this mailinglist was much higher than on the bugtracker.
There is no good reason for that. There are some reasons against it, like bugreports that are only sent to the mailing lists tend to be forgotten if they're not fixed immediately.
Any progress on that problem? Anyone working on it. Is this really so complicated?
Ciao
Hi,
now we have same complains on "executable-crontab-file" If I remove executable bits rpmlint complains about "non-executable-crontab-file"
Very funny :)
Ciao
Dirk Stöcker schrieb:
Hello,
whether I add "Packager" in a spec file or not, rpmlint complains in both cases. One time because of hardcoding. The other time because it is missing.
Could this please be fixed?
What I would like to see is that the buildservice-email-address also used in the GPG key of the repository is automatically copied into the spec (like e.g. changelog or revision).
Is this possible (thought that would not fix the hardcoding error message) or can the name+email be added in the build command directly?
Ciao
buildservice@lists.opensuse.org
-
Christian -
Dirk Mueller -
Dirk Stöcker -
Richard Bos