19 Aug
2015
19 Aug
'15
20:45
Hi,
the netwwork:samba:TESTING/samba project failed to build till we added
an line with
%exclude /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
to the spec.
Shouldn't anything from this location be catched by the automatically
created samba-debuginfo package and therefore not cause trouble like the
seen one?
This is how it works for network:samba:STABLE/samba (4.2.3) while
the code in network.samba:TESTING/samba is 4.3.0rc3 based.
Cheers,
Lars
--
Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ]
Samba Team + SUSE Labs
SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
19 Aug
19 Aug
21:02
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 22:45 +0200, Lars Müller wrote:
Hi,
the netwwork:samba:TESTING/samba project failed to build till we
added
an line with
%exclude /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
This is 100% wrong... there is another error inside your .spec file.
Most likely, you're wrongly using %exclude against a binary/library.
%exclude is ONLY suitable to exclude a file to be matched by a glob AND
only if this said file ends up in a different sub-package.
Any other case, if the file is not to be packaged: rm it after it has
been installed.
Cheers,
Dominique
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org
21:26
Hi Dominique,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:02:23PM +0200, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 22:45 +0200, Lars Müller wrote:
Thanks again for your polite feedback.
the netwwork:samba:TESTING/samba project failed to build till we
added
an line with
%exclude /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
This is 100% wrong... there is another error inside your .spec file.
Most likely, you're wrongly using %exclude against a binary/library. %exclude is ONLY suitable to exclude a file to be
matched by a glob AND
only if this said file ends up in a different sub-package.
Any other case, if the file is not to be packaged: rm it after it has
been installed.
We exclude three man pages which are installed unintentionally.
There might be something else broken. But who knows.
Cheers,
Lars
--
Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ]
Samba Team + SUSE Labs
SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
21:35
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 23:26 +0200, Lars Müller wrote:
The rule would still apply: if it should not be packaged at all, it
should be deleted in the install section. Man pages normally do not
cause this issue though when excluded... binaries do (and it's
generally a pain to find, so I'd simply recommend to never sue
%exclude, unless the file does go to a different package)
Hi Dominique,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:02:23PM +0200, Dominique Leuenberger /
DimStar wrote:
Did I offend you with my reply? Apologies if this sounded rude to you
(it does not to me, and was certainly not meant to be rude)
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 22:45 +0200, Lars Müller
wrote:
Thanks again for your polite feedback.
the netwwork:samba:TESTING/samba project failed to build till we
added
an line with
%exclude /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
This is 100% wrong... there is another error inside your .spec
file.
Most likely, you're wrongly using %exclude against a
binary/library. %exclude is ONLY suitable to exclude a file to be
matched by a glob
AND
only if this said file ends up in a different sub-package.
Any other case, if the file is not to be packaged: rm it after it
has
been installed.
We exclude three man pages which are installed unintentionally. There might be something else broken. But who knows.
I can try to branch and remove the %exclude 'fix' added to see what
this gives.. but it will have to wait for tomorrow I'm afraid.
Cheers,
Dominique
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org
20 Aug
20 Aug
00:13
On Wednesday 2015-08-19 23:35, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
Expanding on that:
%exclude not only excludes the file, it also causes rpmbuild to
"untrack" and not report it -- the latter part is unwanted by most
developers though.
This is why rm in %install is preferable. Preferably even without -f,
so that one notices when the file is gone upstream.
(smells like wiki material ;-)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org
We exclude three man pages which are installed unintentionally.
The rule would still apply: if it should not be packaged at all, it
should be deleted in the install section. Man pages normally do not
cause this issue though when excluded... binaries do (and it's
generally a pain to find, so I'd simply recommend to never sue
%exclude, unless the file does go to a different package)
05:38
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 22:45 +0200, Lars Müller wrote:
Hi,
the netwwork:samba:TESTING/samba project failed to build till we
added
an line with
I branched samba, removed the %exclude line you mentioned and hoped to
get an error... but at least for openSUSE_Factory, this builds just
fine at
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:dimstar:branches:network:s
amba:TESTING/samba
The applied diff is really nothing else but:
@@ -1744,7 +1744,6 @@
%if 0%{?suse_version} > 1220
%{_var}/adm/fillup-templates/sysconfig.samba
%endif
-%exclude /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
%files client
%defattr(-,root,root)
I see also Marcus Meissner rebuilt your samba package with the same
diff (plus some more debug); he did not limit it to Factory, but
rebuilt all repositories you have in :Testing too... apparently also
without issues:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:msmeissn:branches:network:
samba:TESTING/samba
So unfortunately, it seems none of us two can actually reproduce the
error you reported / saw when we remove the line you introduced...
Cheers,
Dominique
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org
07:46
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 07:38:26AM +0200, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 22:45 +0200, Lars Müller wrote:
Yes.
My thoughts were:
- you might have a /usr/lib/* wildcard, but this did not appear to be the case.
(the file list generation makes it a bit non obvious)
- you might have switched debuginfo settings on/off
So I am not seeing an error currently.
Ciao, Marcus
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org
Hi,
the netwwork:samba:TESTING/samba project failed to build till we
added
an line with
I branched samba, removed the %exclude line you mentioned and hoped to
get an error... but at least for openSUSE_Factory, this builds just
fine at
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:dimstar:branches:network:s
amba:TESTING/samba
The applied diff is really nothing else but:
@@ -1744,7 +1744,6 @@
%if 0%{?suse_version} > 1220
%{_var}/adm/fillup-templates/sysconfig.samba
%endif
-%exclude /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
%files client
%defattr(-,root,root)
I see also Marcus Meissner rebuilt your samba package with the same
diff (plus some more debug); he did not limit it to Factory, but
rebuilt all repositories you have in :Testing too... apparently also
without issues:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:msmeissn:branches:network:
samba:TESTING/samba
So unfortunately, it seems none of us two can actually reproduce the
error you reported / saw when we remove the line you introduced...
11:03
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:46:15AM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 07:38:26AM +0200, Dominique
Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
ctdb was missing in network:samba:TESTING It is since some minutes
after I posted the initial mail a linked project against
network:samba:STABLE/ctdb again.
The missing ctdb caused only _one_ failing build target. And we saw it
yesterday after I started this thread and enabled it.
One local osc build finished some minutes back and network:samba:STABLE
package samba includes /usr/lib/debug/.build-id again.
Also SLE 11 ppc64 succeeded now in the OBS. Good enough to release. ;)
Cheers,
Lars
--
Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ]
Samba Team + SUSE Labs
SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 22:45 +0200, Lars Müller
wrote:
Yes.
My thoughts were:
- you might have a /usr/lib/* wildcard, but this did not appear to be the case.
(the file list generation makes it a bit non obvious)
- you might have switched debuginfo settings on/off
So I am not seeing an error currently.
the netwwork:samba:TESTING/samba project failed to build till we
added
an line with
I branched samba, removed the %exclude line you mentioned and hoped to
get an error... but at least for openSUSE_Factory, this builds just
fine at
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:dimstar:branches:network:s
amba:TESTING/samba
The applied diff is really nothing else but:
@@ -1744,7 +1744,6 @@
%if 0%{?suse_version} > 1220
%{_var}/adm/fillup-templates/sysconfig.samba
%endif
-%exclude /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
%files client
%defattr(-,root,root)
I see also Marcus Meissner rebuilt your samba package with the same
diff (plus some more debug); he did not limit it to Factory, but
rebuilt all repositories you have in :Testing too... apparently also
without issues:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:msmeissn:branches:network:
samba:TESTING/samba
So unfortunately, it seems none of us two can actually reproduce the
error you reported / saw when we remove the line you introduced...
12:07
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 01:03:31PM +0200, Lars Müller wrote:
[ 8< ]
ctdb was missing in network:samba:TESTING It is since
some minutes
after I posted the initial mail a linked project against
network:samba:STABLE/ctdb again.
The missing ctdb caused only _one_ failing build target. And we saw it
yesterday after I started this thread and enabled it.
One local osc build finished some minutes back and network:samba:STABLE
network:samba:TESTING includes it too
package samba includes /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
again.
Also SLE 11 ppc64 succeeded now in the OBS. Good enough to release. ;)
Even if all looks good for us in network:samba:TESTING this might
nevertheless be an issue on the OBS side. I have no clue how to
investigate further.
Cheers,
Lars
--
Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ]
Samba Team + SUSE Labs
SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
12:21
New subject: [opensuse-buildservice] Re: /usr/lib/debug/.build-id reported as unpackaged files
Lars Müller <lmuelle(a)suse.com> writes:
Even if all looks good for us in network:samba:TESTING
this might
nevertheless be an issue on the OBS side. I have no clue how to
investigate further.
Where is the log file?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab(a)suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org
15:41
New subject: [opensuse-buildservice] Re: /usr/lib/debug/.build-id reported as unpackaged files
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 02:21:36PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Lars Müller <lmuelle(a)suse.com> writes:
It doesn't longer fail even after removing network:samba:TESTING/ctdb
again.
And all we did in between the failing state and the working one was to
link the missing ctdb from network:samba:STABLE
Sorry, this is unfortunately no longer reproduceable. :/
Cheers,
Lars
--
Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ]
Samba Team + SUSE Labs
SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Even if all looks good for us in
network:samba:TESTING this might
nevertheless be an issue on the OBS side. I have no clue how to
investigate further.
Where is the log file?
2301
days inactive
2302
days old
buildservice@lists.opensuse.org
10 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Andreas Schwab -
Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar -
Jan Engelhardt -
Lars Müller -
Marcus Meissner