Hi Dominique, On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:02:23PM +0200, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:

On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 22:45 +0200, Lars Müller wrote:

...

the netwwork:samba:TESTING/samba project failed to build till we added an line with

%exclude /usr/lib/debug/.build-id

This is 100% wrong... there is another error inside your .spec file. Most likely, you're wrongly using %exclude against a binary/library.

Thanks again for your polite feedback.

%exclude is ONLY suitable to exclude a file to be matched by a glob AND only if this said file ends up in a different sub-package.

Any other case, if the file is not to be packaged: rm it after it has been installed.

We exclude three man pages which are installed unintentionally. There might be something else broken. But who knows. Cheers, Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team + SUSE Labs SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany

On Wednesday 2015-08-19 23:35, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:

...

We exclude three man pages which are installed unintentionally.

The rule would still apply: if it should not be packaged at all, it should be deleted in the install section. Man pages normally do not cause this issue though when excluded... binaries do (and it's generally a pain to find, so I'd simply recommend to never sue %exclude, unless the file does go to a different package)

Expanding on that: %exclude not only excludes the file, it also causes rpmbuild to "untrack" and not report it -- the latter part is unwanted by most developers though. This is why rm in %install is preferable. Preferably even without -f, so that one notices when the file is gone upstream. (smells like wiki material ;-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org

Hi, On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 01:03:31PM +0200, Lars Müller wrote: [ 8< ]

ctdb was missing in network:samba:TESTING It is since some minutes after I posted the initial mail a linked project against network:samba:STABLE/ctdb again.

The missing ctdb caused only _one_ failing build target. And we saw it yesterday after I started this thread and enabled it.

One local osc build finished some minutes back and network:samba:STABLE

network:samba:TESTING includes it too

package samba includes /usr/lib/debug/.build-id again.

Also SLE 11 ppc64 succeeded now in the OBS. Good enough to release. ;)

Even if all looks good for us in network:samba:TESTING this might nevertheless be an issue on the OBS side. I have no clue how to investigate further. Cheers, Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team + SUSE Labs SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany

Hi, On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 02:21:36PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:

Lars Müller writes:

...

Even if all looks good for us in network:samba:TESTING this might nevertheless be an issue on the OBS side. I have no clue how to investigate further.

Where is the log file?

It doesn't longer fail even after removing network:samba:TESTING/ctdb again. And all we did in between the failing state and the working one was to link the missing ctdb from network:samba:STABLE Sorry, this is unfortunately no longer reproduceable. :/ Cheers, Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team + SUSE Labs SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany