Hi,
the attached patch changes the behavior of 'osc commit' command. I'm not very happy when I have three places where the changes should be documented: - .changes - %changelog in .spec - osc commit messages
The modified commit command read a differences from 1.) .changes, or 2.) %changelog part of .spec and fill it to the commit message, so you don't need type it again.
Only one problem is - you need change the commit message anyway, because osc check the difference between commit message template and a result, but this should be easily fixed (use a checksum without commit message template).
What do you think about this approach?
Regards Michal Vyskocil
Le mercredi 28 janvier 2009, à 13:11 +0100, Michal Vyskocil a écrit :
Hi,
the attached patch changes the behavior of 'osc commit' command. I'm not very happy when I have three places where the changes should be documented:
- .changes
- %changelog in .spec
- osc commit messages
The modified commit command read a differences from 1.) .changes, or 2.) %changelog part of .spec and fill it to the commit message, so you don't need type it again.
Only one problem is - you need change the commit message anyway, because osc check the difference between commit message template and a result, but this should be easily fixed (use a checksum without commit message template).
What do you think about this approach?
That sounds cool. One issue, though, is that %changelog seems to be only updated when the package reaches openSUSE:Factory. And so you if you do multiple commits, you'll accumulate a lot of changes in your commit message.
Vincent
Hi Michal,
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:11:02PM +0100, Michal Vyskocil wrote:
the attached patch changes the behavior of 'osc commit' command. I'm not very happy when I have three places where the changes should be documented:
- .changes
- %changelog in .spec
- osc commit messages
The modified commit command read a differences from 1.) .changes, or 2.) %changelog part of .spec and fill it to the commit message, so you don't need type it again.
Only one problem is - you need change the commit message anyway, because osc check the difference between commit message template and a result, but this should be easily fixed (use a checksum without commit message template).
What do you think about this approach?
Great idea, I think. Something like this has requested by many people.
Are you going to commit the change?
Peter
buildservice@lists.opensuse.org