[opensuse-buildservice] Re: [opensuse-svn] r8446 - in trunk/buildservice/src/clientlib/python/osc: . osc
On 22.10.2009 11:44, Novell Forge SVN wrote:
Author: jnweiger Date: 2009-10-22 03:43:58 -0600 (Thu, 22 Oct 2009) New Revision: 8446 ... - implemented 'osc ls .' to take proj/pack name from current directory. * Incompatible change: 'osc ls' now defaults to 'osc ls .', * Use 'osc ls /' if you really want to list all projects. * This is meant as a proof of concept. I intend to generalize this usage of '.' for all osc commands. Feedback welcome.
I like this. It's annoying to provide the project and package when already working in that directory. This change makes the commands more consistant, and the usage more similar to svn. Greetings -- Thomas Schmidt (tschmidt [at] suse.de) SUSE Linux Products GmbH :: Research & Development :: Tools "Wer die Vergangenheit kontrolliert, kontrolliert die Zukunft. Wer die Gegenwart kontrolliert, kontrolliert die Vergangenheit." 1984 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@opensuse.org
Am Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2009 12:05:43 schrieb Thomas Schmidt:
On 22.10.2009 11:44, Novell Forge SVN wrote:
Author: jnweiger Date: 2009-10-22 03:43:58 -0600 (Thu, 22 Oct 2009) New Revision: 8446
..
- implemented 'osc ls .' to take proj/pack name from current directory. * Incompatible change: 'osc ls' now defaults to 'osc ls .', * Use 'osc ls /' if you really want to list all projects. * This is meant as a proof of concept. I intend to generalize this usage of '.' for all osc commands. Feedback welcome.
I like this. It's annoying to provide the project and package when already working in that directory. This change makes the commands more consistant, and the usage more similar to svn.
In general yes, but I would like to get incompatible changes discussed first. And I would also like to see that we adapt all commands similar and have not one-exceptions. That and the fact that people had suddenly unexpanded problems with the ls command was the reason that I reverted it first. Juergen and me agreed that on writing a draft concept first, discuss that and than we make all incompatible changes and name it a 1.0 release. With the promise not do it again soon :) So for now, please help us on working on the concept, there are plenty of commands which need to get adapted (and would definitive win through a concept like this). Juergen works afaik already on a wiki page. bye adrian -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE Linux Products GmbH email: adrian@suse.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@opensuse.org
participants (2)
-
Adrian Schröter -
Thomas Schmidt