On Sep 12 2021, Olaf Hering wrote:

How can such corruption prevented in the future?

Don't commit unexpanded sources. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."

On Sep 12 2021, Olaf Hering wrote:

And why would it matter anyway in this case?

You need to adjust the md5sums yourself. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."

On Sep 12 2021, Olaf Hering wrote:

Am Sun, 12 Sep 2021 09:43:07 +0200 schrieb Andreas Schwab :

...

You need to adjust the md5sums yourself.

I can not possible know the expected md5sum.

QED. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."

On Donnerstag, 30. September 2021, 12:54:49 CEST Olaf Hering wrote:

Am Sun, 12 Sep 2021 08:49:49 +0200 schrieb Olaf Hering :

...

How can such corruption prevented in the future?

So the corruption happened once more. But why only for a subset of packages?

https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:languages:ocaml/ocaml

well, there is a conflict in the files. Did you submitted an old version (c7941cd0bf1c36b8ddb8a76617fd5dcc refers to 4.12.1) after commiting a newer version? -- Adrian Schroeter Build Infrastructure Project Manager SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer

Am Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:45:30 +0200 schrieb Olaf Hering :

AFAICS the timeline for ocaml is:

r83 2021-04-22 16:03:30 rq 887316 accepted r201 2021-04-22 16:03:30 rq 887316 propagated r202 2021-09-24 08:58:53 4.12.1 committed 2021-09-24 13:50:26 rq 921329 created r203 2021-09-24 15:01:29 fix committed 2021-09-24 15:01:46 rq 921338 created r204 2021-09-25 00:37:44 4.13.0 committed r84 2021-09-28 17:16:22 rq 921338 accepted There is no commit shown in 'osc log' which propagates rq 921338.

You accepted rq 921338. What did you (or the tools) do to break the _link in devel:languages:ocaml/ocaml? Are there any logs available to understand the breakage? Olaf

On Okt 04 2021, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:

you can re-initialize it as a branch using: osc branch -f openSUSE:Factory ocaml devel:languages:ocaml --nodevel -m "Re-initialize branch"

Just running osc pull in the checkout should be enough. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."

On Okt 04 2021, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:

On Mon, 2021-10-04 at 17:14 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:

...

On Okt 04 2021, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:

...

you can re-initialize it as a branch using: osc branch -f openSUSE:Factory ocaml devel:languages:ocaml --nodevel -m "Re-initialize branch"

Just running osc pull in the checkout should be enough.

That has the negative effect that it might happen again in the future, as it remain a traditional _link with project.diff.

devel:languages:ocaml/ocaml was never a plain link. And even if, the right way to change that is to run osc linktobranch. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."