[opensuse-buildservice] Branched project stalled
Hi, I branched LibreOffice:Stable yesterday to home:frispete:LibreOffice in order to build it for openSUSE 12.2 (as that project is broken for 12.2 and 12.3 since about a week). Unfortunately, no packages appear in the monitor, but the usual problems of this behavior does not apply: * I added a repository (12.2) and * the spec filenames match the package names. What am I do wrong here? Any hint is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Pete -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj@urpla.net> writes:
Unfortunately, no packages appear in the monitor, but the usual problems of this behavior does not apply: * I added a repository (12.2) and * the spec filenames match the package names.
What am I do wrong here?
There are no architectures enabled. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
On 14.11.2013 10:39, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi,
I branched LibreOffice:Stable yesterday to home:frispete:LibreOffice in order to build it for openSUSE 12.2 (as that project is broken for 12.2 and 12.3 since about a week).
Unfortunately, no packages appear in the monitor, but the usual problems of this behavior does not apply: * I added a repository (12.2) and * the spec filenames match the package names.
What am I do wrong here?
There are no architectures in your branch Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
Dne Čt 14. listopadu 2013 11:06:52, Stephan Kulow napsal(a):
What am I do wrong here?
There are no architectures in your branch
Greetings, Stephan
It seems the repo creation is somewheat borked. When I just tried to add some repos over the web-ui it also created them with empty archs. Of course good old osc meta prj -e let me fix it. Cheers Tom
Tomáš Chvátal <tchvatal@suse.cz> writes:
When I just tried to add some repos over the web-ui it also created them with empty archs.
Of course good old osc meta prj -e let me fix it.
You can also edit it in the webui. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 14.11.2013 11:12, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Dne Čt 14. listopadu 2013 11:06:52, Stephan Kulow napsal(a):
What am I do wrong here?
There are no architectures in your branch
Greetings, Stephan
It seems the repo creation is somewheat borked.
When I just tried to add some repos over the web-ui it also created them with empty archs.
Of course good old osc meta prj -e let me fix it.
Would you please don't keep such issues for yourself but tell github? Thanks, Stephan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iD8DBQFShKV1wFSBhlBjoJYRApIUAKDaEbUKNYj2i1cyJW0aYTCcbZXyPwCgyrEZ Xu0366x9wsEt72VGWhBzBlo= =Fbmx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
Dne Čt 14. listopadu 2013 11:27:01, Stephan Kulow napsal(a):
On 14.11.2013 11:12, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Would you please don't keep such issues for yourself but tell github?
I found out ~half hour ago and seen this thread so I thought I would reply here as to point out that it is probably not user fault. Tom
Tomáš Chvátal <tchvatal@suse.cz> writes:
Dne Čt 14. listopadu 2013 11:06:52, Stephan Kulow napsal(a):
What am I do wrong here?
There are no architectures in your branch
Greetings, Stephan
It seems the repo creation is somewheat borked.
Probably the architectures table in the api_production database is broken. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
On 14.11.2013 11:30, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Tomáš Chvátal <tchvatal@suse.cz> writes:
Dne Čt 14. listopadu 2013 11:06:52, Stephan Kulow napsal(a):
What am I do wrong here?
There are no architectures in your branch
Greetings, Stephan
It seems the repo creation is somewheat borked.
Probably the architectures table in the api_production database is broken.
Aehm - that's a pretty wild guess. What brought you to that conclusion? Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de> writes:
On 14.11.2013 11:30, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Tomáš Chvátal <tchvatal@suse.cz> writes:
Dne Čt 14. listopadu 2013 11:06:52, Stephan Kulow napsal(a):
What am I do wrong here?
There are no architectures in your branch
Greetings, Stephan
It seems the repo creation is somewheat borked.
Probably the architectures table in the api_production database is broken.
Aehm - that's a pretty wild guess. What brought you to that conclusion?
That's where the `recommended' column is stored, which IIUC defines the default selection of architectures in a new repository. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
On 14.11.2013 12:02, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de> writes:
On 14.11.2013 11:30, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Tomáš Chvátal <tchvatal@suse.cz> writes:
Dne Čt 14. listopadu 2013 11:06:52, Stephan Kulow napsal(a):
What am I do wrong here?
There are no architectures in your branch
Greetings, Stephan
It seems the repo creation is somewheat borked.
Probably the architectures table in the api_production database is broken.
Aehm - that's a pretty wild guess. What brought you to that conclusion?
That's where the `recommended' column is stored, which IIUC defines the default selection of architectures in a new repository.
I appreciate your guessing, but if you check osc api /architectures you'll see recommended architectures I fixed the bug, but I won't cheat on you - keep guessing ;) Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de> writes:
I fixed the bug, but I won't cheat on you - keep guessing ;)
There's also an entry with no name: <entry name="" available="false" recommended="false"/> Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
On 14.11.2013 12:27, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de> writes:
I fixed the bug, but I won't cheat on you - keep guessing ;)
There's also an entry with no name:
<entry name="" available="false" recommended="false"/>
That's indeed interesting, but it's not the problem - the ID of that entry is 13 which must be pretty old. No, the fix is: - <%= hidden_field_tag(reponame + '_arch[]', arch.name, :id => reponame + '_arch_' + arch.name) if arch.recommended == 'true' %> + <%= hidden_field_tag(reponame + '_arch[]', arch.name, :id => reponame + '_arch_' + arch.name) if arch.recommended %> Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
On Donnerstag, 14. November 2013 11:06:52 Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 14.11.2013 10:39, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi,
I branched LibreOffice:Stable yesterday to home:frispete:LibreOffice in order to build it for openSUSE 12.2 (as that project is broken for 12.2 and 12.3 since about a week).
Unfortunately, no packages appear in the monitor, but the usual problems of
this behavior does not apply: * I added a repository (12.2) and * the spec filenames match the package names.
What am I do wrong here?
There are no architectures in your branch
Thanks guys. Silly me. Beaten with blindness... Let me add this comment: that is a deviation in behavior at least. In former times, i386 and x86_64 were selected by default, when choosing the repo via the simple repo selection interface. It renders it somewhat useless, if no architectures are selected by default.. BTW, it's a few minutes after I selected the archs, and still no progress. Cheers, Pete -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
On Donnerstag, 14. November 2013 12:20:41 Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 14. November 2013 11:06:52 Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 14.11.2013 10:39, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi,
I branched LibreOffice:Stable yesterday to home:frispete:LibreOffice in order to build it for openSUSE 12.2 (as that project is broken for 12.2 and 12.3 since about a week).
Unfortunately, no packages appear in the monitor, but the usual problems of
this behavior does not apply: * I added a repository (12.2) and * the spec filenames match the package names.
What am I do wrong here?
There are no architectures in your branch
Thanks guys. Silly me. Beaten with blindness...
Let me add this comment: that is a deviation in behavior at least.
In former times, i386 and x86_64 were selected by default, when choosing the repo via the simple repo selection interface. It renders it somewhat useless, if no architectures are selected by default..
BTW, it's a few minutes after I selected the archs, and still no progress.
It's 3 hours later and still no go. Hmm, Pete -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
Am Donnerstag, 14. November 2013, 15:30:36 schrieb Hans-Peter Jansen:
On Donnerstag, 14. November 2013 12:20:41 Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 14. November 2013 11:06:52 Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 14.11.2013 10:39, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi,
I branched LibreOffice:Stable yesterday to home:frispete:LibreOffice in order to build it for openSUSE 12.2 (as that project is broken for 12.2 and 12.3 since about a week).
Unfortunately, no packages appear in the monitor, but the usual problems of
this behavior does not apply: * I added a repository (12.2) and * the spec filenames match the package names.
What am I do wrong here?
There are no architectures in your branch
Thanks guys. Silly me. Beaten with blindness...
Let me add this comment: that is a deviation in behavior at least.
In former times, i386 and x86_64 were selected by default, when choosing the repo via the simple repo selection interface. It renders it somewhat useless, if no architectures are selected by default..
BTW, it's a few minutes after I selected the archs, and still no progress.
It's 3 hours later and still no go.
osc meta prj home:frispete:LibreOffice repo has still no architecture lines. -- Adrian Schroeter email: adrian@suse.de SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
Am Donnerstag, 14. November 2013, 15:36:44 schrieb Adrian Schröter:
Am Donnerstag, 14. November 2013, 15:30:36 schrieb Hans-Peter Jansen:
On Donnerstag, 14. November 2013 12:20:41 Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 14. November 2013 11:06:52 Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 14.11.2013 10:39, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi,
I branched LibreOffice:Stable yesterday to home:frispete:LibreOffice in order to build it for openSUSE 12.2 (as that project is broken for 12.2 and 12.3 since about a week).
Unfortunately, no packages appear in the monitor, but the usual problems of
this behavior does not apply: * I added a repository (12.2) and * the spec filenames match the package names.
What am I do wrong here?
There are no architectures in your branch
Thanks guys. Silly me. Beaten with blindness...
Let me add this comment: that is a deviation in behavior at least.
In former times, i386 and x86_64 were selected by default, when choosing the repo via the simple repo selection interface. It renders it somewhat useless, if no architectures are selected by default..
BTW, it's a few minutes after I selected the archs, and still no progress.
It's 3 hours later and still no go.
osc meta prj home:frispete:LibreOffice
repo has still no architecture lines.
In general, you can always test the repository setup with osc buildinfo $PROJECT ... directly after you have changed something. No need to wait for 3 hours. -- Adrian Schroeter email: adrian@suse.de SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
Quoting Adrian Schröter <adrian@suse.de>:
Am Donnerstag, 14. November 2013, 15:30:36 schrieb Hans-Peter Jansen:
On Donnerstag, 14. November 2013 12:20:41 Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 14. November 2013 11:06:52 Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 14.11.2013 10:39, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi,
I branched LibreOffice:Stable yesterday to home:frispete:LibreOffice in order to build it for openSUSE 12.2 (as that project is broken for 12.2 and 12.3 since about a week).
Unfortunately, no packages appear in the monitor, but the usual problems of
this behavior does not apply: * I added a repository (12.2) and * the spec filenames match the package names.
What am I do wrong here?
There are no architectures in your branch
Thanks guys. Silly me. Beaten with blindness...
Let me add this comment: that is a deviation in behavior at least.
In former times, i386 and x86_64 were selected by default, when choosing the repo via the simple repo selection interface. It renders it somewhat useless, if no architectures are selected by default..
BTW, it's a few minutes after I selected the archs, and still no progress.
It's 3 hours later and still no go.
osc meta prj home:frispete:LibreOffice
repo has still no architecture lines.
This indicates a clear 'defect' in OBS now: if you check the 'meta' in https://build.opensuse.org/project/meta/home:frispete:LibreOffice there is clearly a difference.. so seems webui and osc no longer read (and write?) the same meta. Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
On Donnerstag, 14. November 2013 16:47:57 Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a. Dimstar wrote:
Quoting Adrian Schröter <adrian@suse.de>:
Am Donnerstag, 14. November 2013, 15:30:36 schrieb Hans-Peter Jansen:
On Donnerstag, 14. November 2013 12:20:41 Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 14. November 2013 11:06:52 Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 14.11.2013 10:39, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi,
I branched LibreOffice:Stable yesterday to
home:frispete:LibreOffice in
order to build it for openSUSE 12.2 (as that project is
broken for 12.2
and 12.3 since about a week).
Unfortunately, no packages appear in the monitor, but the
usual problems
of
this behavior does not apply: * I added a repository (12.2) and * the spec filenames match the package names.
What am I do wrong here?
There are no architectures in your branch
Thanks guys. Silly me. Beaten with blindness...
Let me add this comment: that is a deviation in behavior at least.
In former times, i386 and x86_64 were selected by default, when
choosing the
repo via the simple repo selection interface. It renders it somewhat useless, if no architectures are selected by default..
BTW, it's a few minutes after I selected the archs, and still no progress.
It's 3 hours later and still no go.
osc meta prj home:frispete:LibreOffice
repo has still no architecture lines.
This indicates a clear 'defect' in OBS now: if you check the 'meta' in https://build.opensuse.org/project/meta/home:frispete:LibreOffice there is clearly a difference..
so seems webui and osc no longer read (and write?) the same meta.
Dominique
Exactly. Thanks to Adrians' hint, I was able to resolve it with osc meta prj -e Thanks, guys. It's building now. Cheers, Pete -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
Am 14.11.2013 16:47, schrieb Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a. Dimstar:
This indicates a clear 'defect' in OBS now: if you check the 'meta' in https://build.opensuse.org/project/meta/home:frispete:LibreOffice there is clearly a difference..
so seems webui and osc no longer read (and write?) the same meta.
As I can't see it anymore - could anyone please write a test case? Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 20:46 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 14.11.2013 16:47, schrieb Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a. Dimstar:
This indicates a clear 'defect' in OBS now: if you check the 'meta' in https://build.opensuse.org/project/meta/home:frispete:LibreOffice there is clearly a difference..
so seems webui and osc no longer read (and write?) the same meta.
As I can't see it anymore - could anyone please write a test case?
Not the test case you were hoping for, but still better than nothing: https://build.opensuse.org/project/meta/home:dimstar:testprj => shows i586 and x86_64 in the meta whereas
osc meta prj home:dimstar:testprj <project name="home:dimstar:testprj"> <title>Test No content</title> <description>For fun</description> <person userid="dimstar" role="maintainer"/> <repository name="openSUSE_13.1"> <path project="openSUSE:13.1" repository="standard"/> </repository> </project>
Cheers, Dominique -- Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@opensuse.org> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
Am 14.11.2013 20:22, schrieb Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger:
On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 20:46 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 14.11.2013 16:47, schrieb Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a. Dimstar:
This indicates a clear 'defect' in OBS now: if you check the 'meta' in https://build.opensuse.org/project/meta/home:frispete:LibreOffice there is clearly a difference..
so seems webui and osc no longer read (and write?) the same meta.
As I can't see it anymore - could anyone please write a test case?
Not the test case you were hoping for, but still better than nothing:
https://build.opensuse.org/project/meta/home:dimstar:testprj => shows i586 and x86_64 in the meta
whereas
osc meta prj home:dimstar:testprj <project name="home:dimstar:testprj"> <title>Test No content</title> <description>For fun</description> <person userid="dimstar" role="maintainer"/> <repository name="openSUSE_13.1"> <path project="openSUSE:13.1" repository="standard"/> </repository> </project>
Hmm, that's also what's in the backend. That looks suspiciously like some invalid caching Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 22:20 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 14.11.2013 20:22, schrieb Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger:
On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 20:46 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 14.11.2013 16:47, schrieb Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a. Dimstar:
This indicates a clear 'defect' in OBS now: if you check the 'meta' in https://build.opensuse.org/project/meta/home:frispete:LibreOffice there is clearly a difference..
so seems webui and osc no longer read (and write?) the same meta.
As I can't see it anymore - could anyone please write a test case?
Not the test case you were hoping for, but still better than nothing:
https://build.opensuse.org/project/meta/home:dimstar:testprj => shows i586 and x86_64 in the meta
whereas
osc meta prj home:dimstar:testprj <project name="home:dimstar:testprj"> <title>Test No content</title> <description>For fun</description> <person userid="dimstar" role="maintainer"/> <repository name="openSUSE_13.1"> <path project="openSUSE:13.1" repository="standard"/> </repository> </project>
Hmm, that's also what's in the backend. That looks suspiciously like some invalid caching
I'd say with 99.5% certainty it is NOT any cache on my system: - I added the archs from withing Firefox (before sending the mail) - I now just verified if I see the same in Epiphany: yes; and they clearly do not share caches. Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
Am 14.11.2013 21:29, schrieb Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger:
I'd say with 99.5% certainty it is NOT any cache on my system: - I added the archs from withing Firefox (before sending the mail) - I now just verified if I see the same in Epiphany: yes; and they clearly do not share caches.
I was talking about the cache of _meta within the API. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org
participants (7)
-
Adrian Schröter -
Andreas Schwab -
Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger -
Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a. Dimstar
-
Hans-Peter Jansen -
Stephan Kulow -
Tomáš Chvátal