[opensuse-buildservice] Failed to add repository from build service
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/6b2ec66c6a7057e2d6744b539e7f8dda.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hello, I failed to add OpenSUSE build service repositories to two different OpenSUSE 10.2 servers. repositories are "home:dstoecker" and "science" Attached is a y2log I tried with following URL ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/repositories/home:/dstoecker/openSUSE_10.2 It seems there are some problems with the key file. I had no trouble to add the same source on my desktop system with OpenSUSE10.2. The only difference is that the 2 servers have no desktop system installed and I used yast commandline version (thought there should be no difference between GUI and commandline version, shouldn't it). The question are: - is that a build-service problem - is this an yast problem I should report for openSUSE10.2 Additional note: Had no problem on a 10.1 server. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/84ee0bcf221e4fb2b4741908022b82fb.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Am Donnerstag 08 Februar 2007 10:28:10 schrieb Dirk Stoecker:
Hello,
I failed to add OpenSUSE build service repositories to two different OpenSUSE 10.2 servers.
repositories are "home:dstoecker" and "science"
Attached is a y2log I tried with following URL ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/repositories/home:/dstoecker/openSUSE_10.2
It seems there are some problems with the key file. I had no trouble to add the same source on my desktop system with OpenSUSE10.2. The only difference is that the 2 servers have no desktop system installed and I used yast commandline version (thought there should be no difference between GUI and commandline version, shouldn't it).
The question are: - is that a build-service problem - is this an yast problem I should report for openSUSE10.2
Additional note: Had no problem on a 10.1 server.
It is not a bug, it is a feature ... YaST in 10.2 does validate the repository meta data, which means that it accepts only repositories which are signed with an accept key. When you import the key into the rpm database, it should get accepted. Klaus, are there any plans to make this easier for the user ? bye adrian -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany email: adrian@suse.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@opensuse.org
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/e1d3f322373a851c42e21dd2264df481.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:26:18AM +0100, Adrian Schröter wrote:
Am Donnerstag 08 Februar 2007 10:28:10 schrieb Dirk Stoecker:
Hello,
I failed to add OpenSUSE build service repositories to two different OpenSUSE 10.2 servers.
repositories are "home:dstoecker" and "science"
Attached is a y2log I tried with following URL ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/repositories/home:/dstoecker/openSUSE_10.2
It seems there are some problems with the key file. I had no trouble to add the same source on my desktop system with OpenSUSE10.2. The only difference is that the 2 servers have no desktop system installed and I used yast commandline version (thought there should be no difference between GUI and commandline version, shouldn't it).
The question are: - is that a build-service problem - is this an yast problem I should report for openSUSE10.2
Additional note: Had no problem on a 10.1 server.
It is not a bug, it is a feature ...
YaST in 10.2 does validate the repository meta data, which means that it accepts only repositories which are signed with an accept key. When you import the key into the rpm database, it should get accepted.
It rather looks like a bug... which is fixed since yesterday in Factory. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240771 Regards, Peter -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Bug, bogey, bugbear, bugaboo: Research & Development A malevolent monster (not true?); Some mischief microbic; What makes someone phobic; The work one does not want to do. From: Chris Young (The Omnificent English Dictionary In Limerick Form)
participants (3)
-
Adrian Schröter
-
Dirk Stoecker
-
Dr. Peter Poeml