On 2006-09-18 14:03:10 +0100, James Ogley wrote:
IMHO this is not a good idea, I would stick with a :STABLE and :UNSTABLE
GNOME:EXTRAS
I agree with Adrian here that it should be STABLE, not 216.
Also, would the point of EXTRAS be that we build the official GNOME desktop, platform & bindings in STABLE/UNSTABLE and other GNOME apps and libraries in EXTRAS? Which of STABLE and UNSTABLE would EXTRAS be build against?
you can build it against both just different target repositories. see the "Subversion" project in the buildservice. it builds against the plain distro repositories and against Apache. darix -- openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux openSUSE is good for you www.opensuse.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@opensuse.org