18 Sep
2006
18 Sep
'06
13:03
IMHO this is not a good idea, I would stick with a :STABLE and :UNSTABLE
GNOME:EXTRAS
I agree with Adrian here that it should be STABLE, not 216. Also, would the point of EXTRAS be that we build the official GNOME desktop, platform & bindings in STABLE/UNSTABLE and other GNOME apps and libraries in EXTRAS? Which of STABLE and UNSTABLE would EXTRAS be build against? -- James Ogley james@usr-local-bin.org http://usr-local-bin.org Packages for SUSE: http://usr-local-bin.org/rpms Help end poverty: http://oxfam.org.uk/imin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@opensuse.org