On 04/23/2010 07:00 AM, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On 4/23/2010 at 10:53, Adrian Schröter<adrian@suse.de> wrote:
STABLE -- project is considered to be ready to use for End-Users TESTING -- project should work from point of developer view, but needs verification DEVELOPMENT -- project is random state, it might work. BROKEN -- project is known to be not working atm.
Am I right in assuming that BROKEN is a state that would never be shown on the search results? I would maybe favor a different name, like INTERNALUSE or whatever (or having this as an additional state).
I think PRIVATE would be a bit more obvious for this use case. INTERNALUSE would imply this is internal to some organization, but obs by definition is open and external to Novell and any other organization. Robert
Why? I'd like to have my 'playgrounds' tagged in a way to be sure users are not getting there in any way until instructed to do so. I'm not willing to get any bugreports for any such repository. so excluding it intentionally from the search result is a good thing, tagging it as 'BROKEN' would not be the right 'word' for it (internal testing).
I hope anybody can make any sense of that scribble :)
Dominique
-- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU Software Engineer Consultant LINUX rschweikert@novell.com 781-464-8147 Novell Making IT Work As One -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@opensuse.org