* Marcus Rueckert <darix@opensu.se> [2008-03-05 19:57]:
On 2008-03-05 19:31:37 +0100, Bernhard Walle wrote:
* Dr. Peter Poeml <poeml@suse.de> [2008-03-05 16:16]:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:22:06AM -0400, James Oakley wrote:
I have no code yet - because I do not know python yet. That's why I really appreciate that there actually is even more code now to learn :)
Don't learn from this code, unless you're looking for poorly documented PyQt code. :-) Qt itself isn't very pythonic, so there is a lot of Python that you won't typically see in PyQt apps.
I once wrote a graphical application, and I found wxPython most pythonic to work with... but I'm not generally to trust when it comes to graphical applications ;)
Well, wxPython is clearly an advantage if you have Windows in mind, but for Unix only applications I think that wxGtk gives the better user experience. wxWidgets applications are slow (on startup) and don't feel 100 % "native". I don't like that toolkit as user -- no matter if it's Python or C++.
1. Qt works nicely on windows/osx too.
Well, the initial claim was that PyQt is not Pytonish. And looking a bit into the manual of PyQt I agree 100 %.
2. wxWidget usually maps on one of the native GUI toolkits. in case of *nix it is GTK. so i cant see where the native feeling gets lost.
Yes. But things like button sizes, stock icons are different. Or things like the default about dialog are missing. Bernhard --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@opensuse.org