On 1/9/19 11:29 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 04:01:19PM +0100, Adrian Schröter wrote:
On Dienstag, 8. Januar 2019, 15:36:13 CET Neal Gompa wrote:
On Dienstag, 8. Januar 2019, 12:46:12 CET Petr Vanek wrote:
On 1/8/2019 12:03 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 3:36 AM Petr Vanek <petr@yarpen.cz> wrote: > hi all, > > is there any way how I can enable "Developer Toolsets" in centos/rhel > projects in the OBS, please? > > For one of my packages I need gcc toolset >= 5.x, unfortunately these > distros contain 4.x only. > > reference: > > https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-7/ > > or do I need to import all these packages into my OBS? > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/x86_64/rh/devtoolset-7/ Yes, just enable the SCL repository in your project meta for CentOS 7.
For example, this is what I have: <repository name="CentOS_7">
<path project="Fedora:EPEL:7" repository="standard"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-7" repository="scl-rhscl"/> <path project="CentOS:CentOS-7" repository="standard"/> <arch>x86_64</arch>
</repository>
That enables EPEL and the RHSCL repository for CentOS 7 on top of the regular base repo. This is excellent! Thank you very much.
The only issue is that the sync looks outdated. Because my build (osc build ...) wants to download older, already non-existing packages from http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/centos/7/sclo/x86_64/rh
actually requested: devtoolset-7-oprofile-1.2.0-1.el7.sc1.x86_64.rpm
but provided: devtoolset-7-oprofile-1.2.0-2.el7.sc1.x86_64.rpm
Is there some auto-update set? nah, that repo gets currently refused, because the gpg for the signature is not matching anymore.
However, I have atm no clue where I can find the official pubkeys from a
proven source for them. They are not listed here at least: https://www.centos.org/keys/
Does ne1 has a clue? The rhscl and sclo repos are done by the Software Collections SIG. So
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 9:32 AM Adrian Schröter <adrian@suse.de> wrote: that GPG key should be valid for it. right, that is the one which is configured ...
however, it seems the signature seems to be broken indeed atm: Which doesn't surprise me, as the sig was made May 2018... So somebody on the centos side screwed up.
(btw, why do we use http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de instead of http://mirror.centos.org for that repo? Not that it matters, the sig is also wrong on mirror.centos.org)
Is there any chance to get it resolved, please? Eg. to update OBS gpg keyring to accept this key? Or should I contact SCL guys somehow? Petr -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org