On 2007-01-09 16:35:54 +0100, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:07:48PM +0100, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On 2007-01-05 08:35:09 +0100, Hillier, Gernot wrote:
...which reminds me of a question I wanted to ask since quite a time: there's no possibility for a buildservice user to provide "binary-only" RPMs to the buildservice somehow, right? I.e. provide an own "repository" or at least some single packages?
no. what would be the use case? why do you need binary-only rpms from opensource software?
One possible use case is that you have a tool that needs itself to build because it does not provide a clean bootstrap method. In that case it can ease the pain to initially inject a working version into the build system.
i know some possible use cases. i am just curios what his use case is. darix -- openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux openSUSE is good for you www.opensuse.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@opensuse.org